Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil vs Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil

Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites

Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
113 kcal
Energy
357 kcal
2.8g
Sugars
21.4g
1.4g
Fat
17.9g
21.1g
Protein
32.1g
1.2g
Salt
4.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil and Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil is the clear winner. With 244 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil takes the lead with only 2.82g of sugar per 100g, whereas Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites contains 21.4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil or Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites?

Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil vegan?

No, Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil and Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites?

There is a difference of 244 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.