Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild caught, tuna steaks vs Riga Gold Smoked Sardines In Oil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild caught, tuna steaks

Wild caught, tuna steaks

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Riga Gold Smoked Sardines In Oil

Riga Gold Smoked Sardines In Oil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
356 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.4g
Fat
32g
24.8g
Protein
17g
0.1g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild caught, tuna steaks and Riga Gold Smoked Sardines In Oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild caught, tuna steaks is the clear winner. With 250 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Wild caught, tuna steaks offers a protein boost with 24.78g per 100g, outperforming Riga Gold Smoked Sardines In Oil in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild caught, tuna steaks or Riga Gold Smoked Sardines In Oil?

It depends on your goals. Wild caught, tuna steaks has 106 calories, while Riga Gold Smoked Sardines In Oil has 356 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild caught, tuna steaks vegan?

No, Wild caught, tuna steaks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild caught, tuna steaks and Riga Gold Smoked Sardines In Oil?

There is a difference of 250 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.