Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat vs North Sea Chopped Herrings

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat

Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat

Not Vegan
VS
Package of North Sea Chopped Herrings

North Sea Chopped Herrings

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
118 kcal
Energy
202 kcal
4.7g
Sugars
13.3g
1.2g
Fat
12.5g
21.2g
Protein
6.5g
1g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat and North Sea Chopped Herrings side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat is the clear winner. With 84 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat takes the lead with only 4.71g of sugar per 100g, whereas North Sea Chopped Herrings contains 13.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat offers a protein boost with 21.2g per 100g, outperforming North Sea Chopped Herrings in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat or North Sea Chopped Herrings?

Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat vegan?

No, Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat and North Sea Chopped Herrings?

There is a difference of 84 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.