WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS vs Kipling Mini Battenbergs X5
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS
Kipling Mini Battenbergs X5
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS and Kipling Mini Battenbergs X5 side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS is the more energy-dense option here, packing 14391 more calories per 100g than Kipling Mini Battenbergs X5. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kipling Mini Battenbergs X5 contains 62.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS offers a protein boost with 3330g per 100g, outperforming Kipling Mini Battenbergs X5 in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS or Kipling Mini Battenbergs X5?
It depends on your goals. WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS has 14800 calories, while Kipling Mini Battenbergs X5 has 409 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS vegan?
No, WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between WILD-CAUGHT YELLOWFIN AHI TUNA STEAKS and Kipling Mini Battenbergs X5?
There is a difference of 14391 calories per 100g between the two products.
