Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild herring fillets vs CHUNK LIGHT TUNA

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild herring fillets

Wild herring fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of CHUNK LIGHT TUNA

CHUNK LIGHT TUNA

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
97.3 kcal
2g
Sugars
0g
14g
Fat
0.9g
14g
Protein
21.2g
0.3g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild herring fillets and CHUNK LIGHT TUNA side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild herring fillets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 103 more calories per 100g than CHUNK LIGHT TUNA. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wild herring fillets contains significantly more sugar (2g) compared to the milder CHUNK LIGHT TUNA (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, CHUNK LIGHT TUNA is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild herring fillets or CHUNK LIGHT TUNA?

It depends on your goals. Wild herring fillets has 200 calories, while CHUNK LIGHT TUNA has 97.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild herring fillets vegan?

No, Wild herring fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild herring fillets and CHUNK LIGHT TUNA?

There is a difference of 103 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.