Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon vs Fillets In Oil Smoked Flavored Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon

Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fillets In Oil Smoked Flavored Salmon

Fillets In Oil Smoked Flavored Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
118 kcal
Energy
188 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
4.1g
Fat
11.2g
20g
Protein
23.8g
0.6g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon and Fillets In Oil Smoked Flavored Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon is the clear winner. With 70 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon or Fillets In Oil Smoked Flavored Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon has 118 calories, while Fillets In Oil Smoked Flavored Salmon has 188 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon vegan?

No, Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon and Fillets In Oil Smoked Flavored Salmon?

There is a difference of 70 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.