Wild Ruby Red vs Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild Ruby Red
Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild Ruby Red and Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Ruby Red is the clear winner. With 529 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Wild Ruby Red takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds contains 40g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild Ruby Red or Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds?
Wild Ruby Red appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Wild Ruby Red vegan?
No, Wild Ruby Red is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild Ruby Red and Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds?
There is a difference of 529 calories per 100g between the two products.
