Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad vs Foods organic chicken bone broth

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad

Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Foods organic chicken bone broth

Foods organic chicken bone broth

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
181 kcal
Energy
20.8 kcal
1.9g
Sugars
0g
11.2g
Fat
0.2g
10g
Protein
4.2g
0g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad and Foods organic chicken bone broth side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad is the more energy-dense option here, packing 160 more calories per 100g than Foods organic chicken bone broth. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad contains significantly more sugar (1.88g) compared to the milder Foods organic chicken bone broth (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Foods organic chicken bone broth is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Foods organic chicken bone broth in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad or Foods organic chicken bone broth?

It depends on your goals. Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad has 181 calories, while Foods organic chicken bone broth has 20.8 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad vegan?

No, Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Tuna & Red Bean Salad and Foods organic chicken bone broth?

There is a difference of 160 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.