Head-to-Head Analysis

Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles vs Crunchy Channa

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles

Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Crunchy Channa

Crunchy Channa

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
5.7g
Sugars
0g
25.7g
Fat
0g
11.4g
Protein
0g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles and Crunchy Channa side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles is the more energy-dense option here, packing 286 more calories per 100g than Crunchy Channa. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles contains significantly more sugar (5.71g) compared to the milder Crunchy Channa (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Crunchy Channa is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles offers a protein boost with 11.43g per 100g, outperforming Crunchy Channa in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles or Crunchy Channa?

It depends on your goals. Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles has 286 calories, while Crunchy Channa has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles vegan?

No, Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wonderful, Pistachios, Sweet Chili singles and Crunchy Channa?

There is a difference of 286 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.