Head-to-Head Analysis

Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake vs Cinnamon Applesauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake

Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cinnamon Applesauce

Cinnamon Applesauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
391.5 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
16.8g
15.7g
Fat
0g
7.6g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake and Cinnamon Applesauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake is the more energy-dense option here, packing 391 more calories per 100g than Cinnamon Applesauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cinnamon Applesauce contains 16.814159292035g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake offers a protein boost with 7.6g per 100g, outperforming Cinnamon Applesauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake or Cinnamon Applesauce?

It depends on your goals. Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake has 391.4913957318 calories, while Cinnamon Applesauce has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake vegan?

No, Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wong Ping Kee Elite Jasmine Pineapple Cake and Cinnamon Applesauce?

There is a difference of 391 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.