Head-to-Head Analysis

ZBar Cinnamon Roll vs White Chocolate Macadamia

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of ZBar Cinnamon Roll

ZBar Cinnamon Roll

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of White Chocolate Macadamia

White Chocolate Macadamia

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
389 kcal
Energy
452 kcal
27.8g
Sugars
22.6g
11.1g
Fat
22.6g
0g
Protein
12.9g
0.9g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing ZBar Cinnamon Roll and White Chocolate Macadamia side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, ZBar Cinnamon Roll is the clear winner. With 63 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. ZBar Cinnamon Roll contains significantly more sugar (27.8g) compared to the milder White Chocolate Macadamia (22.6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, White Chocolate Macadamia is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: ZBar Cinnamon Roll or White Chocolate Macadamia?

It depends on your goals. ZBar Cinnamon Roll has 389 calories, while White Chocolate Macadamia has 452 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is ZBar Cinnamon Roll vegan?

No, ZBar Cinnamon Roll is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between ZBar Cinnamon Roll and White Chocolate Macadamia?

There is a difference of 63 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.